[Bioperl-l] Bio::Seq issue
paolo.pavan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 09:41:54 EDT 2012
Ok, I can do it.
2012/6/10 Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at drycafe.net>
> Hi Paolo,
> Do you have some experience with using git and github? If you fork the
> repository, make your change, and then send us a pull request, your fix
> tracks under your username, rather than only a mention in text in a commit
> message if we applied a patch.
> See here for documentation:
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Paolo Pavan wrote:
> > Ah! Ok, I see. You use the primarySeq method instead, I agree, my fault.
> > Actually I meant to write that but I didn't and perl of course does never
> > complain! ;-)
> > And forgive me for the duplicate post, I wasn't sure it was delivered.
> > Bye,
> > Paolo
> > 2012/6/7 Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com>
> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paolo Pavan <paolo.pavan at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> No, I didn't already send the patch because the mailer daemon blocked
> >> No, it just was just delayed for moderation. It made it to the list:
> >> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2012-May/036593.html
> >> In general any attachment seems to trigger this.
> >> Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
More information about the Bioperl-l