BioPerl has switched (as of mid-April, 2014) to GitHub Issues. We still have access to the Redmine-based tracking system, but this will be effectively read-only. We no longer support access to the original Bugzilla instance.
Please submit bugs or enhancement requests to BioPerl GitHub Issues. The older BioPerl Redmine tracking system remains but is will no longer be used, and the oldest Bugzilla-based system is not supported and addition of new bugs has been disabled.
We really do want you to submit bugs, even though it means more things for us to do! It means there is something we didn’t think of or test in the particular module and we won’t know about this unless you tell us. The Redmine system requires you register to avoid spam and to allow us to contact you again when the bug is fixed or to clarify the problem and solutions.
It is important that you record the version of BioPerl you are running (if you don’t know, see the FAQ the question is addressed there). You can also include the version of Perl you are using and the Operating System you are running.
When submitting new bugs on BioPerl on GitHub, enter a brief description and other general information. You can use Markdown to add links, syntax highlighting, and so on; see the GitHub Markdown docs for more.
You can paste example code in the description, but we suggest submitting as a GitHub Gist. If you have example fixes, we highly suggest using the tools GitHub has in place, namely the ability to fork the code and create a pull request with the relevant fix. This will show up as an issue automatically, so there isn’t a need to file one separately.
Note that attachments on GitHub issues only work for images. If the example is a text file then use a GitHub Gist; alternatively, if the file is something available publicly then please provide a link to the file.
We gladly welcome patches. Patches for bioperl code should be created as described in the . Try to ensure the patch is derived against the latest code checked out from Git, particularly if the patch is large.
Briefly, you can generate the patch using the following command:
diff -u old new
For best results, follow this example:
cd $YOUR_WORKING_DIST_DIRECTORY/Bio/Frobnicator git pull git diff GrokFrobnicator.pm > my-patch.dif
We also accept new code, either as full-fledged modules or as snippets of code (snippets work better as a patch). New code must include documentation, example code (typically listed in a SYNOPSIS section), and tests with decent test coverage following our testing standards in our ). Because we are moving to a more modular scheme for future Bioperl installations we highly suggest individual submission of modules to CPAN, primarily to help lower the barrier to submitting bug fixes.
Good bug reports are ones which provide a small amount of code and the necessary test files to reproduce your bug. By doing this work up front you insure the developer spends most of his or her time actually working on the problem. Pasting your entire 600 line program into the comment buffer is probably not going to get an enthusiastic response. In addition, isolating the problem down to a small amount of your code will help ensure that the bug is not on your end before we dive in and start working on it.
This list details the open Bugs on GitHub for BioPerl.